![]() I don't disagree with what other's have said in this thread. MAZAK and SolidCam have been partnering more on big and complicated machine type projects. The customer has the "Ear" of their development teams. It's not a giant faceless entity that hands down it's offerings from on high they build what ever seems like a good idea driven from their customer base. The 2 Dorris Sharmans… SolidCam is very pro-active about engaging with customers to add new features to their software. With SolidCam it is easier to connect to support in general and then there are the KevCam "Night classes" online where they are happy to field any questions or do a mini on-line workshop for you. Interested in what you found more appealing about SolidCam over MC ? Is Solidcam really as good as the reps made it to be. (I did do Autocad 2d and 3d 9year's ago)Īs for Solidcam it looks pretty similar to Mastercam.ģ. I have installed the 30 days demo for fusion 360 and seem to be really struggling with the software in basic stuff due to not knowing were everything is. ![]() I have been using Mastercam for 7year's now and i'm quite comfortable using it. We have had Solidcam and a conference call from Fusion 360. So we have been looking at other options before we go ahead. We know the posts will cost a bit mainly on the sharmans but thats irrelevant. We have numerous lathes, mills (vertical and hori) and 2 Dorris Sharmans with full facing head and live tooling. So we had a quote and was quite expensive. We currently have Mastercam 2018, we was looking for another seat. In a bit of a dilemma, our company is looking at another seat for Cam.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |